![]() | Medical Policy |
Subject: Non-Invasive Measurement of Left Ventricular End Diastolic Pressure in the Outpatient Setting | |
Document #: MED.00053 | Publish Date: 04/16/2025 |
Status: Reviewed | Last Review Date: 02/20/2025 |
Description/Scope |
This document addresses non-invasive measurement of left ventricular end diastolic pressure in the outpatient setting. Left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is elevated in the setting of congestive heart failure, and its measurement may be useful in the management of individuals with heart failure. The Vivio® and VeriCor® devices are examples of devices for the non-invasive measurement of LVEDP.
Position Statement |
Investigational and Not Medically Necessary:
Non-invasive measurement of left ventricular end diastolic pressure in the outpatient setting is considered investigational and not medically necessary.
Rationale |
Most individuals with suspected heart failure (HF) do not require invasive testing for confirmation of diagnosis, but no single noninvasive test is considered gold standard for diagnosis. Left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is elevated in the setting of HF, and its measurement has been proposed to be useful in the management of HF. However, to date, measurement of LVEDP has required cardiac catheterization, either by direct measurement by placing a catheter in the left ventricle, or indirect measurement by placing a catheter in the pulmonary artery to measure the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), the latter of which is the current clinical gold standard. Non-invasive measurements of LVEDP have been developed based on the observation that the arterial pressure during the strain phase of the Valsalva maneuver may directly reflect the LVEDP. (See the Definitions section for information about Valsalva maneuvers).
The ability to perform measurements of LVEDP non-invasively permits the outpatient use of this technology and potentially broadens the selection criteria for LVEDP measurement, to potentially include its role in the ongoing monitoring and management of stable individuals with HF. The manufacturer of the VeriCor device (CVP Diagnostics, Inc., Boston MA) suggests that the device may be used to determine the need for hospitalization or to monitor individuals with HF to maintain LVEDP within a targeted range to prevent future hospitalizations.
Although published studies have shown a high correlation between invasive and non-invasive measurements of LVEDP, to date, there have been limited evidence-based trials to demonstrate equivalence to the current established gold standard for HF assessment, which remains cardiac catheterization. Sharma and colleagues performed simultaneous measurements of LVEDP based on three techniques: direct measurement of LVEDP (by left cardiac catheterization); indirect measurement using PCWP; and noninvasive measurement using the VeriCor device in 49 participants scheduled for elective cardiac catheterization. It was noted that the VeriCor measurements correlated well with the direct measures of LVEDP (R2=0.86) and outperformed the PCWP, which had a correlation coefficient of 0.81, compared to the gold standard (Sharma, 2002). In 2011, Sharma conducted another small prospective study which examined if non-invasive monitoring of LVEDP would reduce re-hospitalization rates in individuals hospitalized for HF. A total of 50 participants admitted for HF were randomized to management guided by daily non-invasive estimated LVEDP monitoring (group I, open) to a target LVEDP of less than 20 mm Hg or management based on clinical assessment alone without knowledge of the estimated LVEDP (group II, blinded). Non-invasive estimated LVEDP was measured by the VeriCor monitor. The primary endpoints were the reduction of estimated LVEDP at discharge and the HF re-hospitalization rate on follow-up. Estimated LVEDP was significantly reduced at discharge in the open group compared with the blinded group (mean estimated LVEDP 19.7 ± 1.3 mm Hg versus 25.6 ± 1.5 mm Hg, respectively, p=0.01). The re-hospitalization rates for HF on follow-up were significantly improved in the open group compared with the blinded group (at 1 month: 0% versus 25%, respectively [p=0.05]; at 3 months: 0% versus 32% [p=0.01]; at 6 months: 4% versus 36% [p=0.01]; at 1 year: 16% versus 48% [p=0.03]). The authors concluded that therapy guided by estimated LVEDP monitoring optimizes filling pressures and reduces HF re-hospitalization rates. However, it was acknowledged that the findings of this small study need to be validated in larger well-designed trials (Sharma, 2011).
On October 6, 2023 the Vivio® LVEDP System (Avicena, LLC, Pasadena, CA) received clearance from the FDA through the 510(k) approval process (K223905). The Vivio® System is indicated to non-invasively estimate if LVEDP is above or below 18 mm Hg in adults only.
The pivotal clinical trial was published in 2023 in the form of a conference abstract only, and describes the multicenter validation study of 728 individuals enrolled across 7 U.S. medical centers and referred for coronary angiography and left heart catheterization; an additional 321 controls were enrolled and assumed to have an LVEDP=10 mmHg. The training dataset (n=262, mean age 45 ± 19 yrs; 54% male) contained 101 individuals with LVEDP measurements (n=44 with LVEDP > 18 mmHg) and 161 controls. The validation dataset (n=155) contained 75 individuals with LVEDP measurements (n=40 with LVEDP > 18 mmHg) and 80 controls. The cross-validation analysis of the training dataset yielded a sensitivity of 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70 to 0.93) and a specificity of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79 to 0.89). The validation dataset yielded a sensitivity of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.64 to 0.91) and a specificity of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.90). Based on the preliminary results from this conference abstract, further investigation is warranted.
In 2023, a study by Cheng and colleagues was published which evaluated the practicality and reliability of the Vivio system in 50 children and young adults (median age 9.9; range 0-21) using an intrinsic frequency–machine learning (IF-ML) approach. Normal versus abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was identified with 92% accuracy (sensitivity=100%, specificity=89%, area under the curve [AUC]=0.95). Via cross-validation analysis, accuracy was only slightly diminished at 88% (sensitivity=93%, specificity=86%, AUC=0.86). Although the device consistently detected abnormal LVEF values (defined as <50%), the single cohort design, limited sample size (n=50) and absence of clinically meaningful outcomes precluded conclusions surrounding real world utility in the clinical setting.
At the present time, there are inadequate data to permit scientific conclusions regarding the clinical utility of non-invasive LVEDP technology. To date, there are no large, well-designed, published studies that examined whether including routine measurement of LVEDP in the outpatient setting resulted in improved management of HF, as evidenced by improvement in the clinical signs and symptoms or the need for hospitalization.
Background/Overview |
The heart is a muscle that acts as an automatic pump to circulate blood throughout the body. Congestive heart failure (CHF), or the more recently used term, heart failure (HF), is a condition in which the heart's function as a pump is inadequate to meet the body's needs. Approximately 2 out of every 100 people between the ages of 27 and 74 have HF. HF becomes more common with advancing age. A poor blood supply resulting from HF may cause the body's organ systems to fail. When the heart's pumping action is inadequate as a result of HF, the blood "backs up" (becomes congested) in the venous system that leads to the heart. This congestion can lead to fluid accumulation in the lungs and body tissues. HF is a grouping of clinical findings, rather than a specific diagnosis or a single disease, and can be considered a symptom of impairment of the pumping action of the heart that is caused by an underlying disease.
The VeriCor device (CVP Diagnostics, Inc., Boston MA) obtained clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the non-invasive measurement of LVEDP on June 7, 2004 through the 510(k) approval process. The FDA labeled indication is as follows:
The VeriCor System is indicated for use in estimating (noninvasively) left ventricular end-diastolic (LVEDP) pressure. This estimate, when used along with clinical signs and symptoms and other patient test results (including weights on a daily basis), can aid the clinician in the selection of further diagnostic tests to use in the process of reaching a diagnosis and formulating a therapeutic plan when abnormalities of intravascular volume are suspected. The device has been clinically validated in males only. Use of the device in females has not been investigated (FDA, 2004).
The device consists of a digital expiratory manometer coupled with a continuous arterial pressure monitor and a medical grade computer. A tonometric sensor is attached to the individual’s wrist with a blood pressure cuff attached to the arm. After an 8-minute tonometric calibration period is completed, the VeriCor system is ready for use. For the test, the individual is prompted to perform a Valsalva maneuver by blowing into the mouthpiece of the digital manometer to produce an expiratory pressure of 20 to 30 mm Hg for a minimum of 8 seconds. The digital signals are collected and stored on a medical grade computer. The arterial pressure signals are then analyzed according to algorithms that were developed to most accurately predict PCWP.
The Vivio® LVEDP System (Avicena, LLC, Pasadena, CA) received clearance from the FDA on October 6, 2023 through the 510(k) approval process (K223905). The FDA labeled indication is as follows:
The Vivio® System is indicated to non-invasively estimate whether left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is above or below 18 mm Hg. This measurement can aid in the diagnosis of heart failure when used by qualified healthcare professionals as an adjunct alongside other clinically relevant information. For use in adults only.
The Vivio device consists of an arm cuff system, an EKG patch, and a software application that runs on a standard computer tablet. To use the system, the blood pressure arm cuff is attached to the individual’s upper arm, and two electrodes connected to the EKG Patch are placed on the left side of the chest. Data is collected non-invasively at both the brachial artery and via the single-lead EKG Patch. The collected data is processed by a proprietary algorithm based on a fixed parameter model. The result indicates whether the individual’s LVEDP is likely above or below 18 mmHg, providing a binary output. This information is intended to be interpreted in conjunction with other diagnostic tests and clinical observations to aid in the diagnosis of heart failure (FDA, 2023).
The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) 2001 Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure stated that, “Invasive and noninvasive hemodynamic measurements in the management of heart failure remain uncertain” (Hunt, 2001). The 2005 ACC/AHA Guideline update for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult states that, “There has been no established role for periodic invasive or noninvasive hemodynamic measurements in the management of heart failure” (Hunt, 2005). This position was repeated in the 2009 focused update from the ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults (Hunt, 2009) and in the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults (Jessup, 2009) with no change regarding hemodynamic measurements, and the above statement is considered current. Additional updated guidelines from the ACC/AHA (2022) do not address non-invasive measurements of LVEDP (Heidenreich, 2022).
The following is excerpted from the 2009 updated guidelines regarding the basis for their position:
Most drugs used for the treatment of heart failure (HF) are prescribed on the basis of their ability to improve symptoms or survival rather than their effect on hemodynamic variables. Moreover, the initial and target doses of these drugs are selected on the basis of experience in controlled trials and are not based on the changes they may produce in cardiac output or pulmonary wedge pressure …Nevertheless, invasive hemodynamic measurements may assist in the determination of volume status and in distinguishing HF from other disorders that may cause circulatory instability, such as pulmonary diseases and sepsis. Measurements of cardiac output and pulmonary wedge pressure through a pulmonary artery catheter have also been used in patients with refractory HF to assess pulmonary vascular resistance, a determinant of eligibility for heart transplantation. Cardiac output can also be measured by noninvasive methods (Hunt, 2009; Jessup, 2009).
The Valsalva maneuver may be contraindicated in a variety of cardiovascular conditions, for example, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, significant aortic valvular disease and recent myocardial infarction (FDA, 2004).
Definitions |
Congestive heart failure (CHF) also known as heart failure (HF): A condition in which the heart cannot pump enough blood to supply the body's tissues with sufficient nutrients that results in a back-up of blood in the vessels and lungs and causes the build-up of fluid in the tissues.
Left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP): The pressure at the end of the filling phase of the heartbeat contraction, which is the clinical definition of preload.
Valsalva maneuver: The act of attempting to forcibly exhale while keeping the mouth and nose closed. It is used as a diagnostic tool to evaluate the condition of the heart and is sometimes done as a treatment to correct abnormal heart rhythms or to relieve chest pain.
Coding |
The following codes for treatments and procedures applicable to this document are included below for informational purposes. Inclusion or exclusion of a procedure, diagnosis or device code(s) does not constitute or imply member coverage or provider reimbursement policy. Please refer to the member's contract benefits in effect at the time of service to determine coverage or non-coverage of these services as it applies to an individual member.
When services are Investigational and Not Medically Necessary:
When the code describes a procedure indicated in the Position Statement section as investigational and not medically necessary.
CPT |
|
93799 | Unlisted cardiovascular service or procedure [when specified as left ventricular filling pressure; indirect measurement by computerized calibration of the arterial waveform response to Valsalva maneuver] |
|
|
ICD-10 Diagnosis |
|
| All diagnoses |
References |
Peer Reviewed Publications:
Government Agency, Medical Society, and Other Authoritative Publications:
Websites for Additional Information |
Index |
Congestive Heart Failure
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Pressure, Noninvasive Measurement
LVEDP, Noninvasive Measurement
VeriCor, Left Ventricular End Diastolic Pressure
Vivio® LVEDP System
The use of specific product names is illustrative only. It is not intended to be a recommendation of one product over another, and is not intended to represent a complete listing of all products available.
Document History |
Status | Date | Action |
Reviewed | 02/20/2025 | Medical Policy & Technology Assessment Committee (MPTAC) review. Revised Description/Scope, Rationale, Background/Overview, References, Websites and Index sections. |
Reviewed | 02/15/2024 | MPTAC review. Updated Rationale, Background/Overview and References sections. |
Reviewed | 02/16/2023 | MPTAC review. Updated Background and References sections. |
Reviewed | 02/17/2022 | MPTAC review. References were updated. |
Reviewed | 02/11/2021 | MPTAC review. References were updated. |
Reviewed | 02/20/2020 | MPTAC review. References were updated. |
Revised | 03/21/2019 | MPTAC review. The acronym (LVEDP) was removed from the title and position statement. References were updated. |
Reviewed | 05/03/2018 | MPTAC review. The document header wording was updated from “Current Effective Date” to “Publish Date.” References were updated. |
Reviewed | 05/04/2017 | MPTAC review. References were updated. |
Reviewed | 05/05/2016 | MPTAC review. References were updated. Removed ICD-9 codes from Coding section. |
Reviewed | 05/07/2015 | MPTAC review. References were updated. |
Reviewed | 05/15/2014 | MPTAC review. References were updated. |
Reviewed | 05/09/2013 | MPTAC review. The Rationale, Background, and References were updated. |
Reviewed | 05/10/2012 | MPTAC review. The Rationale, Background and References were updated. |
Reviewed | 05/19/2011 | MPTAC review. References were updated. |
Reviewed | 05/13/2010 | MPTAC review. References were updated. |
| 01/01/2010 | Updated Coding section with 01/01/2010 CPT changes; removed CPT 0086T deleted 12/31/2009. |
Reviewed | 05/21/2009 | MPTAC review. The Rationale and References were updated. |
Reviewed | 05/15/2008 | MPTAC review. References were updated. |
| 02/21/2008 | The phrase "investigational/not medically necessary" was clarified to read "investigational and not medically necessary." This change was approved at the November 29, 2007 MPTAC meeting. |
Reviewed | 05/17/2007 | MPTAC review. References section was updated. |
Reviewed | 06/08/2006 | MPTAC review. References were revised to add the 2005 updated ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in the Adult. |
Revised | 07/14/2005 | MPTAC review. Revision based on Pre-merger Anthem and Pre-merger Wellpoint Harmonization. |
Pre-Merger Organizations | Last Review Date | Document Number | Title |
Anthem, Inc. | 01/13/2005 | MED.00053 | Non-Invasive Measurement of Left Ventricular End Diastolic Pressure (LVEDP) in the Outpatient Setting |
WellPoint Health Networks, Inc. | 12/02/2004 | 2.04.31 | Non-Invasive Measurement of Left Ventricular End Diastolic Pressure (LVEDP) in the Outpatient Setting |
Federal and State law, as well as contract language, including definitions and specific contract provisions/exclusions, take precedence over Medical Policy and must be considered first in determining eligibility for coverage. The member’s contract benefits in effect on the date that services are rendered must be used. Medical Policy, which addresses medical efficacy, should be considered before utilizing medical opinion in adjudication. Medical technology is constantly evolving, and we reserve the right to review and update Medical Policy periodically.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without permission from the health plan.
© CPT Only – American Medical Association