Medical Policy |
Subject: Insulin Potentiation Therapy | |
Document #: MED.00128 | Publish Date: 01/03/2024 |
Status: Reviewed | Last Review Date: 11/09/2023 |
Description/Scope |
This document addresses insulin potentiation therapy (IPT): administration of insulin as an adjunctive agent to potentiate the effects of pharmacologic therapy in the treatment of cancer as well as infectious diseases, chronic degenerative disorders, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, arthritis, and many other conditions. The adjunctive use of insulin is believed to enhance the effect of chemotherapy by “opening up” the receptors on cancer cells to increase absorption of the pharmacological agent or chemotherapy, thereby lowering the effective chemotherapy dose.
Position Statement |
Investigational and Not Medically Necessary:
Insulin potentiation therapy (IPT) is considered investigational and not medically necessary for the treatment of cancer, infectious diseases, chronic degenerative disorders, and all other conditions.
Rationale |
There is currently only one published randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the effects of IPT in metastatic breast cancer (Lasalvia-Prisco, 2004). The trial studied 30 women with metastatic breast cancer and measurable lesions resistant to fluorouracil, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, and also hormone therapy. Participants were divided into 3 separate groups, each consisting of 10 women. Group 1 received two 21-day courses of insulin and methotrexate; group 2 received two 21-day courses of methotrexate; and group 3 received two 21-day courses of insulin. In each subject, the size of the target tumor was measured before and after treatment. The changes in the size of the target tumor in the 3 groups were compared statistically. The median increase in tumor size was significantly lower with insulin and methotrexate than with each drug used separately. The authors concluded that insulin enhanced the chemotherapy effect. While this study may suggest insulin enhances a biochemical event with the administration of chemotherapy in the short term, it does not report any long-term effects or health outcomes. Therefore, further studies are warranted to provide more conclusive evidence of any improvement in health outcomes with the use of insulin potentiation therapy.
In a non-randomized study, Damyanov and colleagues (2012) evaluated the results and quality of life (QOL) of 16 men with castration-resistant prostate tumors previously treated with IPT combined with hormone therapy. The individuals were divided into 2 groups of 8 men. Group A had been treated with low-dose chemotherapy (epirubicin, vinblastine, and cyclophosphamide combined with goserelin depot) and group B had been treated with low-dose chemotherapy (docetaxel combined with goserelin depot). Prostate specific antigen (PSA) results after 6 treatments of IPT showed partial effect in 50% of the men, stabilization in 25%, and progression in 25%. The authors concluded that the advantage of this method was its effectiveness along with improved QOL; however, well-designed RCTs are needed for routine implementation of IPT.
The majority of the evidence regarding IPT is derived from individual (anecdotal) case reports. Even among these, however, there has been no evidence that those who reported being helped by IPT were followed long enough to verify treatment efficacy. IPT has also reportedly been used as treatment for fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, arthritis, and some infections. However, the safety and efficacy of this therapy have not been confirmed with well-designed clinical trials for these additional indications.
In a 2019 review regarding IPT and its underlying physiology theory, Sissung and colleagues note the poor quality of the two published studies assessing IPT and note:
Further clinical evidence on IPT is not likely to be forthcoming and stands in stark contrast with the claims of supporters who say IPT is safe and effective. On the contrary, there is substantial scientific evidence that insulin treatment and increased concentrations of intracellular sugars accelerate both tumour progression and chemoresistance.
Background/Overview |
IPT involves administering insulin at the same time as chemotherapy and other medications, with the idea that lower drug doses are then needed because insulin lets more of the drug enter cells. However, evidence is lacking to support this theory.
IPT was developed in the 1930s in Mexico by Donato Perez Garcia, Sr, MD and has been explored by a few physician practices (Ayre, 2000). IPT involves fasting for 6 to 8 hours, followed by initiation of intravenous (IV) fluids, and administration of an insulin dose based on body weight. For those with cancer, low doses of chemotherapy drugs are administered a few minutes later after the initiation of insulin to lower blood sugar. This is called the “therapeutic moment” by some IPT providers.
At this point, a treated individual usually has some symptoms of hypoglycemia, which can be quite severe, especially during first-time treatment, as responses may vary to a standard dose of insulin. As a result, the IV infusion can be modified to a high-sugar solution to raise the blood sugar. After the symptoms of low blood sugar begin to improve, food may be given to raise the blood sugar further. At the next treatment, the insulin dose may be raised or lowered, depending on the individual’s response to the first dose. Administration of insulin to non-diabetics can decrease blood sugar to dangerously low levels, causing symptoms such as headache and delirium.
Coding |
The following codes for treatments and procedures applicable to this document are included below for informational purposes. Inclusion or exclusion of a procedure, diagnosis or device code(s) does not constitute or imply member coverage or provider reimbursement policy. Please refer to the member's contract benefits in effect at the time of service to determine coverage or non-coverage of these services as it applies to an individual member.
When services are Investigational and Not Medically Necessary:
For the following procedure and diagnosis codes only when describing insulin potentiation therapy, or when the code describes a procedure indicated in the Position Statement section as investigational and not medically necessary.
CPT |
|
96549 | Unlisted chemotherapy procedure [when specified as insulin potentiation therapy] |
|
|
HCPCS |
|
| For the following codes only when described as related to insulin potentiation therapy: |
J1815 | Injection, insulin, per 5 units [only when provided as part of insulin potentiation therapy] |
J1817 | Insulin for administration through DME (i.e., insulin pump) per 50 units [only when provided as part of insulin potentiation therapy] |
| Note: all other administration of insulin is not addressed in this document |
|
|
ICD-10 Diagnosis |
|
| For the following diagnoses only when the treatment is specified as insulin potentiation therapy: |
A00.0-B99.9 | Certain infectious and parasitic diseases |
C00.0-C96.9 | Malignant neoplasms |
D00.00-D09.9 | In situ neoplasms |
M00.00-M19.93 | Infectious arthropathies, inflammatory polyarthropathies, osteoarthritis |
M79.7 | Fibromyalgia |
R53.81-R53.83 | Other malaise and fatigue |
Z51.11-Z51.12 | Encounter for antineoplastic chemotherapy and immunotherapy |
Z85.00-Z85.9 | Personal history of malignant neoplasm |
References |
Peer Reviewed Publications:
Websites for Additional Information |
Index |
Intermittent Intravenous Insulin Therapy
Insulin-Potentiated Targeted Low-Dose Therapy (IPTLD)
Insulin Potentiation Therapy
IPT
Pulse Insulin Therapy
Document History |
Status | Date | Action |
Reviewed | 11/09/2023 | Medical Policy & Technology Assessment Committee (MPTAC) review. Updated Websites for Additional Information section. |
Reviewed | 11/10/2022 | MPTAC review. Updated Websites for Additional Information section. |
Reviewed | 11/11/2021 | MPTAC review. Updated Rationale and References sections. |
Reviewed | 11/05/2020 | MPTAC review. Updated Description, Background, Websites for Additional Information and Index sections. |
| 10/01/2020 | Clarified wording in Coding section. |
Reviewed | 11/07/2019 | MPTAC review. Updated Websites section. |
| 04/24/2019 | Converted document category from DRUG.00034 to MED.00128. |
Reviewed | 11/08/2018 | MPTAC review. |
Reviewed | 10/31/2018 | Hematology/Oncology Subcommittee review. Websites for Additional Information section updated. |
Reviewed | 11/02/2017 | MPTAC review. |
Reviewed | 11/01/2017 | Hematology/Oncology Subcommittee review. The document header wording updated from “Current Effective Date” to “Publish Date.” Websites for Additional Information section updated. |
Reviewed | 11/03/2016 | MPTAC review. |
Reviewed | 11/02/2016 | Hematology/Oncology Subcommittee review. Websites for Additional Information section updated. |
Reviewed | 11/05/2015 | MPTAC review. |
Reviewed | 11/04/2015 | Hematology/Oncology Subcommittee review. Rationale, Background/ Overview, References and Websites for Additional Information sections updated. Removed ICD-9 codes from Coding section. |
Reviewed | 11/13/2014 | MPTAC review. |
Reviewed | 11/12/2014 | Hematology/Oncology Subcommittee review. Rationale and Reference sections updated. |
Reviewed | 11/14/2013 | MPTAC review. |
Reviewed | 11/13/2013 | Hematology/Oncology Subcommittee review. References updated. |
Reviewed | 11/08/2012 | MPTAC review. |
Reviewed | 11/07/2012 | Hematology/Oncology Subcommittee review. Rationale, Reference, and Index sections updated. |
Reviewed | 11/17/2011 | MPTAC review. |
Reviewed | 11/16/2011 | Hematology/Oncology Subcommittee review. Rationale and reference link updated. |
Reviewed | 11/18/2010 | MPTAC review. |
Reviewed | 11/17/2010 | Hematology/Oncology Subcommittee review. Description, rationale, background, and references updated. |
Reviewed | 11/19/2009 | MPTAC review. |
Reviewed | 11/18/2009 | Hematology/Oncology Subcommittee review. Rationale, background, coding, and references updated. Web sites for additional information section added. |
Reviewed | 11/20/2008 | MPTAC review. |
Reviewed | 11/19/2008 | Hematology/Oncology Subcommittee review. Rationale and reference link updated. |
| 10/01/2008 | Updated Coding section with 10/01/2008 ICD-9 changes. |
Reviewed | 11/29/2007 | MPTAC review. |
Reviewed | 11/28/2007 | Hematology/Oncology Subcommittee review. Rationale and references updated. The phrase “investigational/not medically necessary” was clarified to read “investigational and not medically necessary.” |
New | 12/07/2006 | MPTAC review. |
New | 12/06/2006 | Hematology/Oncology Subcommittee review. Initial document development. |
Federal and State law, as well as contract language, including definitions and specific contract provisions/exclusions, take precedence over Medical Policy and must be considered first in determining eligibility for coverage. The member’s contract benefits in effect on the date that services are rendered must be used. Medical Policy, which addresses medical efficacy, should be considered before utilizing medical opinion in adjudication. Medical technology is constantly evolving, and we reserve the right to review and update Medical Policy periodically.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without permission from the health plan.
© CPT Only – American Medical Association